Monday, July 1, 2019

Real Life Spansih

Pecha Kucha

Who am I?
The dominant ideologies of our culture can be defined with the acronym, SCWAAMP. Of these seven areas, As a straight, Catholic, able-bodied, American, property owner, I belong to six of the dominant ideologies. It is interesting to note the frustrations that I often feel in the one category where I am not a part of the dominant culture. This helps put into perspective, how someone may feel who is not a part of the dominant culture in more than just one area. I teach a group of high school students are are mostly part of the dominant culture as well, however since I teach Spanish, we often discuss some ideals that may seem insignificant to my students, in particular, "Americanness." A LOT of my (SCWAAMPy) students push back against learning Spanish because they do not believe it be a necessity since "we live in America and people should speak English."



What do I believe?
I believe students learn best when they feel they are successful.  I also believe success breeds further success and that students can only succeed when they are not afraid to fail.  

What Change Do I Need To Make?
I find that students are often overwhelmed by the things they do NOT know in Spanish instead of what they DO know.  They tend to compare their linguistic ability in their first language to their second language.  It’s not a fair comparison! Majority of my students are at a (TOPS) kindergarten level of communicative Spanish, and maybe second grade reading comprehension level.  They may feel intimidated when they think in English and try to translate to Spanish because they speak English at such a higher level.  When trying to learn a language this way, it is easy to get bogged down what you don't know.    

What have I learned?
Before this class, I believe I would have fallen into the category of techno-traditionalist.  And truth be told, I am still there.  However, I now have the tools to at least get one foot into the pool of techno-constructivist.  I use Google Classroom regularly and do a lot of online/digital activities instead of printed activities, however, they are the same activities I once printed.  This class sparked my curiosity to find out what more I, and especially my students could do....aside from submitting homework electronically.   

The easiest text for me to relate to my own teaching practice is Eric Prensky's text on digital natives and immigrants.  This text really resonates with me because of the reference to technology as a language. As with any new language, learning to speak "digital" takes time.  Here in lies the problem. Prensky lists "twitch speed" processing as a trait of a digital native. This means that they want instant answers. It is nearly impossible to acquire any new language at a fast enough pace to hold these digital natives' attention.  Because of this need for twitch speed and the availability of it, students are often tempted to use instant online translators. This accessibility enforces the negative thoughts that learning a language (the old fashion way) takes too long and is a waste of time. 

This idea of instant access flows nicely into Ken Robinson's three principles in which life flourishes.  He believes that humans (including children) are by nature, different and diverse, that curiosity sparks learning, and that humans are inherently creative.  The principle that really connects for me is the idea that curiosity sparks learning.  I think that my students are pushing back against learning because they are not curious about it.  In order to restrict their Spanish to being proper grammar, they repeat the same questions/answers daily, but don't get a chance to expand on it.  There is no curiosity/creativity in that, so of course they are bored and resistant!  

This also ties in nicely with Simon Sinek's belief of giving the "why" to our students, not the "what."  I am constantly giving the grammar (the what) to my students with little reasoning behind learning it.  Aside from whether it falls into the "category" of past, present, or future, the students don't generally have a great understanding of when to use specific grammar, except for when the directions say to use it.  Why do my students need to learn the preterite vs. the imperfect (2 past tenses)??? Well, because a lot of casual conversation and connections are made by sharing stories of your PAST!  Leading with this scenario of meeting people and trying to make connections by sharing experiences would allow students to relate to the content and make their own connections.        



Another problem with this format of repetition is that the students don't have a chance to fail.  Yes, I said that.  I want my students to fail! Why on Earth would I want them to fail?  Because as Wesch and sweet baby George taught us, failure is a necessary part of learning!  Each time baby George fell, he learned what not to do, but he wasn't told what not to do, he discovered it himself.  I think of the million times I've told my kids not to touch something hot, whether it be on the stove or freshly served food - it's a 50/50 chance they listen (depending on how hungry they are).  Until that ONE time, Laura bit into her pizza slice after I told her to wait and she burnt the roof of her mouth.  That was a few years ago and she has since made that same mistake.  Now, I'm not suggesting we allow children to ALWAYS make these types of discoveries, but our classroom should definitely be a safe space for our students to be able to fail - and then learn from those failures.      

What Can I do?
I want to create a space where my students can feel successful and understood and are therefore more motivated.  In order to create this space, there are several changes I would like to implement.     

1. DuoLingo is a great tool for old vocabulary as well as learning new vocabulary. The program introduces new vocabulary and cycles through old vocabulary regularly. Aside from the immediate content, there is a podcast that students can access through the website/app. The podcasts are an excellent resource because they are in "Spanglish." It does not give a direct translation (which does not help students acquire a new language) but gives students a point of reference occasionally in English and adds details and supporting events in Spanish. It has another section of reading comprehension where students hear and read stories and answer comprehension questions as they read.

2. PenPalSchools -- is a great site to practice drawing from texts and responding/communicating appropriately.  PenPalSchools gives samples of how students can draw from the texts to respond to the prompt. When I grade this assignment, grammar will be thrown out the window! I just want my students to feel successful in communicating! 

3. "Spanish In Real Life" blog spot where the students share where Spanish has helped or could have helped them or someone else “in real life.” This will be a shared blog space. The blog has no posts right now but once I get my classes set up, I will add each student as a blog author and allow/encourage them to post. I don't know that I could use this as part of their grade, but for incentive I may count it as a homework replacement as in do the assigned homework OR post to the blog.

4. I am an avid Google Classroom user however I have found it frustrating that since parents don't have school email domains, they do not have access to the Google Classroom site. My students are also resistant to using Google Classroom to it's potential. They use the stream to access homework assignments, but do not use the calendar to check older (missed assignments) or any notes or other posted information. I have created a basic website that has links to all the old as well as the new classroom tools and so much more!

5. I would love for my students to get a chance to experience the various cultures in the Spanish speaking world. There are so sights that are filled with culture and history. I would like to dedicate a part of my website to virtual field trips. I have started a Google Doc listing the Spanish Speaking countries and some important sights to see if/when visiting. I would love for students to explore these areas, using the internet and create some type of digital visual for their peers. The danger here, once again, is with the freedom of the internet, student may be tempted to Google Translate their descriptions.





I am truly looking forward to utilizing all of these amazing tools in the fall. I hope that my students are as open to these new ideas as I am!

Rubric


Friday, June 28, 2019

Digging Deeper


I think that Wesch and Turkle have different approaches but ultimately have similar beliefs.  Turkle discusses the idea that the many devices we have, keep us connected but separate.  We are often "alone together," meaning we are in the same room, but not actively interacting with one another.  She reminds us that "face to face conversations unfold slowly" and that they require time and patience.  It is not a simple question/answer format.  She suggests that this idea of instant answers has changed the way we converse, making us ask less intellectual questions, so that we can be instantly gratified with an answer.  Wesch similarly suggests that our students are having a difficult time finding meaning in their education.  This is something I see/hear regularly from my high school students.  They believe that high school is a waste of time and that nothing in the classroom is relevant to them.  In some cases, I think they are correct.  I think a lot of what is taught, can nowadays, be found on the internet with a click of a button.  Although they say it differently, I think both authors have the same message.  

Wesch says, "My job becomes less about teaching, and more about encouraging students to join me on the quest."  He is acknowledging that our students no longer need us to "teach" them the basic steps of things - that's what "Google" is for!  Our students need us to help them learn how to dig deeper.  This idea connects to Sinek for me.  We need to teach our students to think about the "why" not the (immediate) what.  The "what" is the by product of the "why" - the what is the actual topics/material learned, but the why behind the learning is where we can spark the students curiosity.   
Turkle says, "When people are alone, even for a few moments, they fidget and reach for a device. Here connection works like a symptom, not a cure, and our constant, reflexive impulse to connect shapes a new way of being."  This really struck me because it's something I can easily relate to and am ever conscious of.  Whenever I'm waiting in ANY type of line, Disney line, grocery checkout, amusement park ride, the deli (ugh!), I take a moment and observe the other people who are waiting.  Nearly 100% of the time, people are on their devices. 
This stands out to me as a parent.  A while ago (before I gave up social media), I frustratingly asked my daughter (5ish at the time) why she couldn't just stand in the checkout line at the supermarket without touching EVERY little item???  She calmly pointed out that she was touching things because she didn't have a phone to touch while she waits.  Woah! Thanks for the reality check, little one.  Why can't our children (or students) wait patiently/think through problems?  Well, because it is not regularly modeled for them! Even as a teacher, my students may ask a question I do not know (typically geography related) and my immediate answer is..."well, I don't know...let's google it!"  Instead, I could take these opportunities to encourage my students to dig deeper, and best yet, learn along with them! 

Pecha Kucha

Document

Slides


Thursday, June 27, 2019

Text Overview

Text Overview

The TOY aisle


When brainstorming for our project we were thinking back to some of the blogs we read last night.  The blog post about Sudie Hofmann's chapter, "Miles and Aisles of Sexism," stood out to us.  It is absurd that toy aisles are separated by gender norms.  It would be hard enough for a young girl to admit that she wants to play with nerf guns and ninja turtles, but then add in the fact that she obviously has to walk down the boys aisle makes it that much more difficult.  Our project is a representation of gender neutral toy aisle.  In our aisle we included toys such as "rogue barbie" which is a barbie doll dressed as a warrior/fighter of sorts.  There are also cleaning and cooking products for both boys and girls as well star wars and princess lego sets.  The product itself is only part of the organization, the fact that they are all together is more important.  There is not a section of "boy legos" and "girl legos"  but rather just legos...all types of legos mixed together. If the star wars legos looks cool to the shopping child, there would not be a stigma of which aisle they are shopping in.  Furthermore, if the child were like Laura, she wouldn't even encounter the Star Wars legos because she would NEVER walk down the "boy aisle."

Wednesday, June 26, 2019

To Glee or Not to Glee...

It was fully my intention to continue with the Disney theme and read one of the optional sections from last night to blog about tonight...however, when I was skimming through the available titles, GLEE caught my eye!  I started binge watching Glee back around 2010/11 when I was pregnant with my daughter.  I had caught up with all available episodes on Netflix by the time she came into this world...and then....she was here - and who had time for binge watching?? About a year ago it popped up in my suggested shows on Netflix and I devoured the remaining seasons.  I think my attraction to the show is the typical "wanting what you don't have."  I have always said that if I had a good singing voice, I would live my life like a musical 24/7...and well...that's pretty much the show! So when I saw this show in the list of "texts" that are dissected, I had to "let it (Disney) go." 😁

This chapter delves into TV bullies.  For anyone who does not know, Glee is based on a group of "misfit" students who, together, form the Glee Club of their school.  They are the target of various types of bullying, even from other adults in the building.  This chapter focuses on Kurt Hummel (played by Chris Colfer) and Finn Hudson (played by the late Cory Monteith).  Kurt's "gender performance" is feminine and is constantly harassed by his peers.  In one episode, when entering the locker room, he is told the girls locker room is in a different location. In another episode, his own Glee club mate and supposed friend refuses to share a bedroom with him when their parents (Finn's mom and Kurt's dad) move in together.  (see clip below) Although Finn Hudson is the star quarterback and is straight and follows most male gender "norms," he still a target for the bullies simply because on top of playing football, he also enjoys singing and dancing! 


Gerald Walton argues that these instances should not just be grouped under the umbrella of "bullying."  This type of harassment goes deeper, it is sexual harassment.  He says, "Defining violence in terms of bullying rather than as sexual harassment plays a part in the commodification of this term," (193).  This reminded me of the poem my group worked on yesterday in class, The History Teacher.  In the poem, the teacher "sugar coated" the tragic historical events he was "teaching" his students.  In a similar fashion, when we classify something so severe and SO specific as "bullying," it downplays the severity of the abuse.

Walton also talks about how "bullying" has now become a popular topic in society.  There are MANY programs being sold to teach about bullying and cope with bullying and there are zero tolerance policies being put into action...all for a cost (and profit to the companies).  Walton says that the problem with such programs is that they "focus on the management of the behavior."  He continues by saying, "Educating school communities, including parents, about harassment based on perceived or actual sexual difference is crucial if we are to make serious gains on fostering safety in schools for queer students," (194).

Like many of the topics we discuss in class, Walton suggests we start having discussions we kids at a young age to help raise awareness...and normalcy!

On a personal note, (and also in response to the blog/chapter about kids growing up too fast), my daughter has already been told by a peer that being gay is "weird."  My son said something about wanting to marry his cousin, Logan and her response was "that would make you gay...that's weird."  It blows my mind that marrying their cousin was not "weird" but rather the fact that it was another boy! We had a little chat following that conversation when I tried to undo the damage that was already done - but I know that unfortunately, even at her young age, her peer's opinion is valued WAY more than mine!   

PenPal Schools

One of the hardest aspects of teaching a second language, in my case, Spanish, is to encourage (ahem...force) students to use that language - especially extremely self conscious high school students.  I want my students to focus on the things they ARE learning instead of the things they are missing.  It is easy to take a writing sample and just make it "bleed" red ink, but when they get that paper back all they will see is what they did WRONG.  I want to encourage them to see that despite their grammar being far from perfect, they are still able to COMMUNICATE in Spanish.  The website penpalschools.com allows students to interact with one other using video/text prompts to write their own letter and then also to respond to others.  In order to experiment with the site, I created both a teacher account as well as a student account.  Both were easy to create. 


Things I like:

I like that the teacher can pick various topics and narrow down the penpals the students choose.  I LOVE that teachers can go in and grade the students work and manipulate how the student is graded.  It can range from grammatical accuracy to creativity or all of the above.  I really like how the students see the prompts and are given examples of how they could use would they read/heard to write their response. I LOVE that students are asked to read and respond to three other posts after their own letter.  I LOVE that students are required to create their own project/video presentation to share with others!

What I don't like:
I don't like that while they do have forums/topics to work from, the students can ultimately interact with whoever they want/however they want.  There are a LOT of English speakers using the site, so even though I have selected Spanish as the language and selected Spanish topics, they can ultimately write with whomever.  Ultimately, this is not a HUGE downside as they will still have to complete whatever tasks are assigned to them.  Without a school subscription, you can only enroll your students in one topic.

My fear:
The same fear I ALWAYS have....Google Translate!!!!!!

Here are a few snipits of what both teacher and student view look like.


 teacher view

 student view

Tuesday, June 25, 2019

Let it Go


My husband and I have always been Disney fanatics, but after taking our daughter to Disney for the first time before her 2nd birthday, and witnessing her joy and amazement at what she saw, we have dug ourselves even deeper! Since that first trip, we've been back at least once a year. Every time we go, we say we are going to pick a different vacation spot for the next one, but we are yet to do so!

I can vividly remember watching Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast and especially The Lion King as a child. The Lion King held a special place in my heart because Jonathan Taylor Thomas (swoon! 😜) was the voice of Simba. (I'm looking forward to the live action release in July!)








Disney movies play an overwhelming role in our children's lives.  We play Disney Guess Who, my kids have made up their own Disney character guessing game, and most difficult life experiences can be compared to a Disney character/situation. For example, I was recently talking about "stranger danger" with my kids and I was giving them the scenario of a stranger coming up to them offering them candy or to see their animal.  I described the person as appearing to be kind/sweet/innocent, like the witch in Snow White when disguised as the old lady with the apple, but that the stranger may have evil intentions...like feeding them a poisonous apple!


I can't say that my own memories are reflected in Christensen's claims, as I was FAR from the princess type as a child....I was more of a "Merida!" However, I will say that the one thing that resonates with me to this day is impression of perfection (page 185) that the princesses and all media reflect. Many women (adults, teens, and children) strive to reach a level a perfection that only exits through an intense editing process.


Earlier she mentions that she is uncomfortable with the myth that marriage is the "end goal" for women leads women to treat other women as their competition rather than a "sister." When reading this, I was immediately reminded of the following skit Chris Rock performed.

(**Contains explicit content )



I connected more with Christiansen through my mommy lens. My daughter has been obsessed with all things princess since birth. She does not like winter clothes because she says they "make her look like a boy." She wants tank tops for her birthday, "but not the sporty ones - cute ones." For her theater camp last year she chose the camp down in South Kingston (instead of Cranston) because Shrek (the Cranston play) "was for boys." When I pointed out that Princess Fiona is a girl, she informed me that she doesn't count because she is not pretty! 😟


On page 180, she mentions the stereotype of the "evil stepparents." This stood out to be because just recently, my daughter asked my cousin why she was texting "Auntie Susan" and when my cousin replied by explaining they were close or something like that. My daughter expressed utter confusion because she thought stepmothers were evil!


Frozen challenges these stereotypes in a few ways. The most obvious way *spoiler alert* is that true love's kiss is not the kiss of the "knight in shining armor" but rather of her sister. Throughout the movie, the viewer is first led to believe that Prince Hans will be the "cure" to a frozen heart, but we quickly are led to "jump ship" and route for Christof to be the magic cure. Low and behold, it is neither man who holds the power to thaw a frozen heart. Instead of it is the unconditional love of sisters that breaks the curse.


Another aspect where Frozen breaks the mold is that Christof, for the most part, wants nothing to do with the rescue mission of Elsa. He wants to just be left to do his own thing but Anna is insistent on pursuing the journey with or without him.

The History Teacher

Monday, June 24, 2019

It's Complicated



I have mixed feelings about both authors/ideas. When we discussed Prensky in class, I was thinking, "yes! yes! yes!" But then as I was reading Boyd...I had the same thoughts. For me it is an "and/both" situation. I think people can also read too deeply into the term "native." As we read/hear "digital native" we assume that means fluency. My grandmother was born in Italy...she was an Italian native - but she came to the United States at such a young age that she related/identified FAR more as an Italian-AMERICAN, than an Italian native. On the contrary, by husband did not come here until he was in his early 20s, so he identifies more as a Dominican Republic native than a US/NY native. The difference is easily noted when meeting new people. If you had met my grandmother and asked where she was from, she would tell you, Providence. Although my husband has been in the U.S. almost equally as long as the Dominican Republic at this point, if you ask him where he is from, without hesitation, he will tell you he is from the Dominican Republic.
Image result for italian american . Image result for Dominican pride

When we think of digital literacy as a comparison to language, we can see how the levels of proficiency can fluctuate. Some digital natives may get much more exposure to the language than others. Some simply be born in a world where the technology exists, but not have access to it, or access to help expanding on it. This digital native could be compared to a second generation of immigrant. The child is native to this country, but at home he/she is most likely surrounded by a culture and language that is different from other native U.S. children - therefore, they may not become as fluent in American culture in customs. On pg 177, Boyd says, "It is dangerous to assume that youth are automatically informed. It is also naive to assume that so-called digital immigrants have nothing to offer."  The example of a second generation immigrant can be applied to this quote as well.  If we encounter a second generation immigrant in our classroom, we should not assume they are fluent in their "native language."  In fact, most of the students I have encountered who come from families born in Spanish-Speaking countries, have a basic understanding of the native language, but in fact, are not fluent in Spanish.  (This particular example relates back to our SCWAAMP discussion - since English is so valued, many immigrant families do not enforce their children learning their native language and instead encourage them to learn English.)

On pg. 196, Boyd says, "I believe that the digital natives rhetoric is worse than inaccurate: it is dangerous. Because of how society has politicized this language, it allows some to eschew responsibility for helping youth and adults navigate a networked world."  I disagree that the term itself is inaccurate but whole heartedly agree with the downfall of how society interprets that terminology.  I also think it's important to note the mention that we push off the responsibility for helping youth (digital natives).  We often assume that because students may be active on social media that they are computer/tech literate.  Using a computer/device for academic purposes is very different than social use.  I use Google Classroom with my high school students, and most have difficulties throughout the whole first quarter.  They don't know how to save/update passwords.  They do not know how to toggle between their personal gmail and their school gmail.  If their personal gmail is integrated into their phone, when Google Classroom opens up Google Docs, it will default to their personal email and they will not have access-most cannot resolve this issue independently.  

Overall, I like the term digital native - I believe that is what these students are; they do not know a world without technology.  However, just like any other language, the student's digital fluency can vary based on the exposure and instruction they have received.   

In this YouTube clip, Ellen talks with some digital natives about older technology. While these children may not be fluent, they have grown up in a world where these once amazing devices are now obsolete compared to the current technology.

I am Bilingual

I was born and completed Lincoln High School long before you could ask Siri, Alexa, or Google anything.  I enjoyed talking on the phone (a landline) with my friends and when "dial up"
via GIPHY

first came out, there were MANY arguments between my brother and I about who should take control of the landline and for how long.  I can remember many times intentionally picking up the phone to kick him off and take control of the line!  When writing research papers, even in college, I had to go to the physical library and take notes on paper from actual books to complete the assignment.  Therefore, I cannot say that I am a digital native.

However, I do believe I am bilingual.  I consider myself to be pretty tech savvy, especially with regards to the Google suite and Apple Photos.  I have become interested in the Apple Photos app because of my kids.  At this moment, on my camera roll alone (not including the photo stream/cloud) I have 2,249 photos and 487 videos and that is only about 1 year's worth of photos.  Since my kids are digital natives - they are obsessed with YouTube and YouTubers (or "yube" tube as my son says) and have created (with our help) their own YouTube channel...we are looking for subscribers.  😉


About Me


My name is Stefanie.  I am a wife (of 1) and mother of 2.  Laura is almost 8 and Brayden is 5.  Summer has been ... only 2 days so far, but they were a good two days.  We have seen both the new Aladdin as well as Toy Story 4, so I'm a little nervous about Dr. Bogad shattering the magic of Disney on Wednesday.  When I am not in class, I am with my kids.  We either hang out at home or are out and about on some local "adventure."  I try to fit in some time for a workout whenever possible.